http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/03/27/mtl-quebec-taser-recall-0327.htmlThe Quebec government will have tasers in the province tested and will discard those out of spec. Finally, some reasonable thoughts about tasers. Hey, they are electronic equipment, maybe they need to go in for a yearly calibration and calibration?
Taser critics are applauding it. Myself, I don't get taser critics. Get rid of tasers, they kill people, sometimes. Yes, and use what - a gun? They kill, most times. Why do taser critics even have so much of a voice these days? It's policy and politics by misinformation I think.
For instance, take the current big case re tasers in Canada at present.
Robert Dziekanski. An irate guy in an airport, armed with a stapler (where are the stapler critics? Silent, they are, in all of this). Yes, he was in the wrong, all agitated in the airport throwing things around, but was tasered right after several RCMP officers arrived. No, not just once, no several times. Then he died.
I'm thinking if it were me, Mr. average citizen, it wouldn't be an inquest into the death, but rather my murder trial. After all, I think it was 4, maybe 5 RCMP officers who arrived to face off with an irate man armed with a stapler. Not even one of those heavy duty industrial staplers, no, just a desk one...
Say it was myself, alone. Yes I'd be worried about the irate man with the stapler. Worried, but not panicked. Just worried. Very worried.
Myself and a buddy. This ones easy. Buddy, you go for the arm with the stapler, I'll go for the throat. We'll pin him down.
Myself and 2 buddies. Same as with one buddy, but with an insurance plan. Hardly fair really.
Myself and 4 buddies. We'll leave it as three on the attack, with the fourth calling the authorities on his cell phone. No need to be stupid about it.
Highly trained RCMP officers grossly outnumbering him....taser him again...again...again...again....more. Offer help/assistance/CPR? No, let him die.
Stupid, negligent and criminal in my view. Yet it spurns a debate, and drives policy. I still think it's quite simple. Taser a person he might die. Likely no, but he could. Shoot a person they will likely die. They might not, but probably yes. In this light, tasers make lots of sense. Using them pointlessly or just because, well, deal with those individuals (idiots) on a case by case basis. Bad employees they are, so get rid of them. Sounds harsh, but really, should I applaud them if they have no taser and only a gun to shoot off just because they couldn't learn some simple guidelines? Hell, do I want them to have/use a gun if they can't follow guidelines on taser use? Really.
By the way, the role of the press in this whole matter absolutely disgusts me. Pump the hype. Sell the headline no matter what the cost. What was the cost? Objectiveness. Integrity.
I wish I'd kept the link, but not that long ago (months) someone was shot in Toronto. He wasn't tasered, as there was not a proper ranking police official available to authorize the use of a taser. Can't use a taser, as it might kill, but go ahead, use your gun. Policy by press. Makes no sense at all.
And to the taser critics? Well, if you were in a situation where someone has to taser you or shoot you, which would you pick?
(Cowards)
Enough said.